|
|
  
 
Subject:
Re: Edelbrock LT1/LT4 intake
From: "Steve Raft" <sraft(at)cybernex.net>
Subject: Re: Edelbrock LT1/LT4 intake
Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2003 19:56:31 -0500
Lines: 21
________________________________________________
Haven`t seen a manifold yet, but i just saw that they introduced a head/cam
packege. They show dyno graphs with a 70+ HP increase. I believe that
that`s with the stock manifold.
Steve Raft
`94 blk/blk Z07 6-spd coupe
"Jack Conley" <jconley(at)cableone.net> wrote in message
news:vrpo75hvjgfu0f(at)corp.supernews.com...
> Has anyone seen or heard of an Edelbrock LT1 or LT4 fuel injected intake
> manifold. I`ve seen the ones that convert to carburetor but i want to keep
> it EFI. Any info on aftermarket EFI upgrades to my LT1 besides the factory
> LT4 manifold?
>
> jack 95 6-speed LT1
>
>
From: "Neil Biswas" <nb350(at)sbcglobal.net>
Subject: Re: Edelbrock LT1/LT4 intake
Lines: 34
NNTP-Posting-Host: 68.89.166.39
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2003 04:39:39 GMT
________________________________________________
Well I have seen one, around 96-97 Edelbrock was going to realease a
aftermarket LT1 Intake Manifold along with a new cam, never happened.
The LT4 manifold will require the LT4 heads, how ever that stock LT1 intake
manifolds can be ported, the front opening can be made to acept a 58mm TB
and will flow very well. It usally costs about $225-250.
"Steve Raft" <sraft(at)cybernex.net> wrote in message
news:vs2lq4pjrvmbe8(at)corp.supernews.com...
> Haven`t seen a manifold yet, but i just saw that they introduced a
head/cam
> packege. They show dyno graphs with a 70+ HP increase. I believe that
> that`s with the stock manifold.
>
> Steve Raft
> `94 blk/blk Z07 6-spd coupe
>
>
>
> "Jack Conley" <jconley(at)cableone.net> wrote in message
> news:vrpo75hvjgfu0f(at)corp.supernews.com...
> > Has anyone seen or heard of an Edelbrock LT1 or LT4 fuel injected intake
> > manifold. I`ve seen the ones that convert to carburetor but i want to
keep
> > it EFI. Any info on aftermarket EFI upgrades to my LT1 besides the
factory
> > LT4 manifold?
> >
> > jack 95 6-speed LT1
> >
> >
>
>
From: Sal <jackwhite200(at)yahoo.com>
Subject: Edmunds.com FIRST comparison test of GTR Spec-V vs ZR1.
Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2009 17:06:28 -0700 (PDT)
Lines: 19
NNTP-Posting-Host: 71.225.112.128
posting-account=m2VpjAoAAACklgiaMXy2ejVr5mKmzhF1
2.0.50727),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Bytes: 2223
________________________________________________
Their ZR1 test resulted in ZR1 does zero to 60 mph in 3.8 seconds (3.5
seconds with 1 foot of rollout) and gets through the quarter-mile in
11.5 seconds.
The 2009 Nissan GT-R SpecV takes off instantly with virtually no tire
spin, and the car catapults to 60 mph from a standstill in 3.7 seconds
(3.3 seconds with 1 foot of rollout), while the quarter-mile flies by
in 11.5 seconds. The 1/4 mile was supposed to be the ZR1`s BEST
advanage and even there it`s a wash, and acutally the Spec-V BEATS the
ZR1 with a 1 foot rollout like in a dragstrip HAHAHAHAHAHA. Also, the
SPEC-V also had the 2nd best timefor EDMUNDS with a 74.7 MPH Slalom
behind the GT3RS. ZR1 got 1.06Gs on Edmunds test on the skidpad and
the Spec-V got 1.16Gs
ZR1=dissapearing speck in SPEC-V`s mirror.
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA, I can`t wait till the SPEC-V PWNS the ZR1 at the RING
NEXT MONTH.
The Funny thing is that the GTR Spec-V is NOT even the high
performance version of the GTR.
It`s not even like a Z06 is to a Corvette. The Spec- NUR would be
comprable to the ZO6.
NEXT POSTS:
| | |
